The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.

Essay topics:

The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.

Firs bar chart illustrate the rate of marriage and divorce in USA for every 10years, during 1970 to 2000.
Although For all four decades marriage had more rate in compare to divorce, dropping in its rate had been occurred. In contrast other variable had fluctuated changes, at first an increasing obvious and later a decreasing is happened. The maximum rate of marriage belong to 1970s and 1980s near to 2.5 million while the most amount of divorce rate was in 1980s.
In other graph during the same interval and for two years 1970 and 2000, the marital status of adults in America was investigated. For both times, most of the adults people had been married, but as said, number of marriage in 1970 was more than in 2000. For 1970, among the single people, never married was more than widowed and divorced people. Similarly in 2000, never married people was located at the top list of single status but after that divorced people had the more amount than widowed.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-21 khanhptk162 67 view
2019-11-21 khanhptk162 67 view
2019-11-12 Nisha_k 73 view
2019-10-22 abelin 73 view
2019-09-06 Ali Rizwan 67 view
Essays by user javad_70 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...pping in its rate had been occurred. In contrast other variable had fluctuated changes, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1980s'.
Suggestion: in the 1980s
...ile the most amount of divorce rate was in 1980s. In other graph during the same inter...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... more than widowed and divorced people. Similarly in 2000, never married people was locat...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, similarly, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72189349112 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24215854822 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.1162767102 43.030603864 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25976728021 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123952737569 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843873421746 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200708082416 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107219431868 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.