The charts below give the information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000, and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years.
The first chart indicates figure for the quantity of marriages and divorces in America the period between 1970 and 2000 while the second one portrays the proportion of mature people in the United States in sectors of never married, married, widowed and divorces in 1970 and 2000. Overall, there was a steady reduction in the marriage rate while the number of divorces fluctuated in a span of 30 years. In terms of the second chart, the quantity of married people gained the highest percentage in comparison with other sectors in both 1970 and 2000.
It is clear from the first chart that the number of marriages remained the same of 2.5 millions in 1970 and 1980. However, there was a slight decrease of marriage rate to 2.25 millions in 1990 and 2 millions in 2000. In the contrast, the quantity of divorces climbed up from 1 million to 1.4 millions in the period between 1970 and 1980. After that period, this number reduced to 1.1 millions in 1990 and 1 million in 2000.
As it can be seen from the second chart that the percentage of the married took up the first place as compared with the rest sectors in both 1970 and 2000 with 70% and about 60% respectively. Similarly, never married stood at the second place with 15% in 1970 and 20% in 2000. It is apparent that the proportion of widowed decreased significantly from 8% to 2% in comparison between 1970 and 2000 while the divorces had the upward trend between 1970 and 2000, 5% and 9% respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
2019-11-21 | khanhptk162 | 67 | view |
2019-11-12 | Nisha_k | 73 | view |
2019-10-22 | abelin | 73 | view |
2019-09-06 | Ali Rizwan | 67 | view |
- Describe something healthy you enjoy doing You should say what you do where you do it who you do it with and explain why you think doing this is healthy 53
- Describe an idea you have had for improving something at college or work.You should include: When and where had you had the idea ?what the idea was ?Who you told about your idea ?and explain why you think that your idea made a difference ? 11
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 61
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 44
- Describe an idea you have had for improving something at college or work You should include When and where had you had the idea what the idea was Who you told about your idea and explain why you think that your idea made a difference 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61685823755 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4615658095 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421455938697 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3195583261 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271531726282 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121953104257 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051826145415 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19361968236 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462308110634 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.