The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
The given layouts reveal the information about the usage of water for three purpose by four countries in 2000.The data is celibrated into per centum.It is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that the usage of water by whole world in 2000. The 70% of water was used to agriculture whereas 22% water had been used for industrial purposes.moreover 8% of water had use for domestic purpose. Apart from this the use of water in selected countries that in China 69%,9%,22% water was used for agriculture, domestic and industry respectively.
On the other hand, In India 92% water had been used for agriculture , and 5% was used in domestic whereas 3% in industry. Furthermore 44% used for agriculture, 46% was used for domestic, and 10% had used for industry. The last one canada, In which 8%, 12%, 80% had been used for agriculture, domestic and industry.
In conclusion, it is evident that large percentage of water was used in agricultural purposes in most of the countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | Kamal1993 | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Dharamsingh12 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Mandeepkaur12 | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | DavinderPB46 | 67 | view |
- In some countries younger people are loosing their interest in teaching profession? Why is this happening? What can be done to improve the situation. 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health by increasing the number of sports facilities others never say that this would have little effects on public health and that other measures are required? 61
- Visual pollution is the major case of accidents on roads. to what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Cities are getting big and overcrowded Give reasons causes and solution for this 62
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...three purpose by four countries in 2000.The data is celibrated into per centum.It i...
^^^
Line 1, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
....The data is celibrated into per centum.It is clear and coherent representation. ...
^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 92% water had been used for agriculture , and 5% was used in domestic whereas 3% ...
^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...sed in domestic whereas 3% in industry. Furthermore 44% used for agriculture, 46% was used ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, whereas, apart from, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8869047619 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01345558019 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6640150556 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292226153659 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151945198397 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427140858763 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184415534095 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456662039316 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.