the chart below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000.
The given pie chart provides information about use of water in different countries on three aspects during the year of 2000. Second layout present the use of water on three aspects by four countries which was : Canada, New Zealand, India and China. Data is calibrated in percentum.
Overall, agriculture was main activity, where much water had been used by all world. Canada used more water on industrial activities. As well as, India was spent 92% water on agriculture, which highest ratio from other countries.
It can be seen that not only 70% water used on agricultural activities, but also 8% water spent on domestic works in whole world. Moreover, industrial works used only 22% water respectively.
Apart from all this, New Zealand used few water on Industrial work, and probably same quantity of water used on Agricultural or Domestic work. Furthermore, China used only 9% water for domestic needs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-23 | Kamal1993 | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Dharamsingh12 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Mandeepkaur12 | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | DavinderPB46 | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the result of a survey of average number of cars per hour using three suburban roads during working hours in a ten year pollution monitoring programme traffic claming was introduced in Harper Lane at the beginning of 1999 83
- Today younger people do not take interest in teaching profession, what are reson behind this and how to improve this. 56
- Light corporal punishment is being reintroduced in schools of UK what are the advantages and disadvantages of it? Discuss. 56
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000. 56
- Foreign language instruction should begin in kindergarten. Discrimination. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'which the highest'.
Suggestion: which the highest
...dia was spent 92% water on agriculture, which highest ratio from other countries. It can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries. It can be seen that not only 70% water used on agricultural activitie...
^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ter used on agricultural activities, but also 8% water spent on domestic works in...
^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
... Apart from all this, New Zealand used few water on Industrial work, and probably ...
^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun water seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little water'.
Suggestion: little water
... Apart from all this, New Zealand used few water on Industrial work, and probably same q...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icultural or Domestic work. Furthermore, China used only 9% water for domestic ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, well, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14093959732 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70048555305 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651006711409 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0703385471 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.6 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354236041986 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146500130124 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988336694878 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221772814786 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10320311333 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.3012195122 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.