The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
The pie charts compare five different areas in terms of the proportions of world forest and timber in each region.
It is clear that while forests in Africa make up the largest percentage of total global forest, the opposite is true for Europe. Additionally, North America is the country with the largest amount of timber, while the figure for Africa is by far lowest.
In terms of forest, just over half of all forest in the world is found in Africa and North America, at 27% and 25% respectively. In contrast, only 16% of global forest is found in South America, and 14% in Europe. Asian countries accounts for 18% of total forest in the world.
Regarding the proportions of timber in these areas, North America contains the largest percentage, at 30%, while 23% and 20% of global timber can be found in South America and Europe respectively. Meanwhile, timber in Asia comprises 18% of world timber, which is exactly double that of Africa.
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 84
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The diagram below shows the production of ceramic pots Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below give information about world forest in five different regions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7987804878 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5214354688 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2153782058 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.375 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116445629623 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063824046777 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564575128305 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0919173587997 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622183002544 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.