The four presented pie charts delineate the finger for citizens on three age groups (0-14 years, 15-59 years, and 60+ years) of 2 different regions (Yemen and Italy) during 2000 and predictions for 2050.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Italy had an older population in the year 2000 and the same is estimated for the year 2050. Also noticeable is that the number of residents of both nations is projected to get older over the 50 years period.
The graphs elucidated the massive number of people in the 0-14 years age group (accounted for over half) in 2000, compared to just over 14% of Italians in the same age group and same timescale. In contrast, most Italians (61,6%) fell into the 15-59 age groups whereas the proportion for Yemeni in the same group age was 46,3%. The percentage of citizens who are 60+ years old from Italy took up for 24,1% as opposed to a mere 3,6% which is Yemeni residents in the same age group.
By 2050, the amount of percent of adolescents under 15 is set to decline in both countries, most significantly in Yemen where the figure is expected to fall by 13,1%. By contrast, the number of elderly people is estimated to increase in Yemen and Italy by slightly 2,1% and tremendously 18,2% respectively. Eventually, it is anticipated that the 15-59 age group will uptick to 10% in Yemen but plummet by around 15% in Italy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...he same is estimated for the year 2050. Also noticeable is that the number of reside...
^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...e was 46,3%. The percentage of citizens who are 60+ years old from Italy took up for 24...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6693877551 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5412219986 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522448979592 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.125819604 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.111111111 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2222222222 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187026322151 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825108153226 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397494414048 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122713072131 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303097999555 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.