The line graph illustrates population trends globally by percentage from 1950 to 2040. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented line chart delineates the global trends of finger for citizens by the proportion between 1950 and 2040.
Looking from a general perspective, it is readily apparent that the total urban and rural population witnessed a significant uptick over the period whereas the percentage of residents age 15-65 years was the biggest and elucidated the most rapid growth compared to the amount of the other two age groups. These trends are estimated to continue in 2040.
The total population was 10% in 1950, but it increased to about 26% in the next 50 years, and it is expected to reach 43% in 2040. In 1950, the urban and rural populations constituted 8% and 2,5% respectively. During the second half of the 20th century, the rural population continued to trail behind metropolis regions by a margin of 8%. By 2040, this population disparity is predicted to get wider with a third of the nation’s population living in cities, over 20% higher than the figure for remote locations.
At the start, about 7% of people in the region were in the 15-65 age group while the figures for citizens who were 0-15 and over 65 years olds stayed the same (under 5%). Following that, the population of individuals aged 16 to 65 years rose in 2000, while the proportions of seniors, children, and early teens also grew, reaching 7% and 5% accordingly. By 2040, 16-65-year-olds are projected to account for 27,5% of the population, considerably higher than the projected figures for the elderly and 0-15 years old, which are 9% and 5,5% in turn.
- Technology is responsible for unemployment To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages 67
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, look, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 263.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87452471483 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73312364679 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2122756645 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.2 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145622555283 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718315668876 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531036162639 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109146064914 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598199647455 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.