The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The depicted pie charts enumerate the comparative data about the population of Yemen and Italy for over five decades, split by three age categories.
Overall, it is evident that the figure for adults in Yemen predicted to increase sharply over the decades, whereas the ratio of the aging population in Italy expected to peak significantly. In addition, the portion for adolescents is certain to downfall in the future.
To initiate, the most marked change will be seen in the Yemeni population of 15-59 age groups, as it is expected to rise considerably from approximately 46 percent in 2000 to nearly 58 percent in 2050, while the population of 0-14 years age group are predicted to decline from exactly a half proportion in 2000 to roughly one-third ratio in 2050. Moreover, the Yemeni population of aging proportion is prevised to rise over the given period.
Furthermore, the majority of Italy population of aged people are expected to rise over the decades, peaking from nearly a quarter ratio in 2000 to almost 45 proportion in 2050. In addition, in 2000, the population of Italy of 15-59 and 0-14 aged groups boasted an impressive 61.6 percent and 14.3 percent, respectively, but in 2050, it is projected that the figure for both aged groups will be fallen gradually to 46.2 percent and 11.5 percent, simultaneously.
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 61
- Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity?What solutions can you suggest? 67
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 73
- The table below shows the number of students living in the UK gaining English language teacher training qualification in 2007/8 and 2008/9, and the proportion of male qualifiers. 78
- Summarise the changes to Liverpool John Moores University from 2010 to 2016. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, third, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86884251323 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493212669683 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.97573369 43.030603864 209% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 159.714285714 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22410593655 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114837702549 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406863696201 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152707945647 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196938316687 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.