The charts below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton.
The pie graph displays the percentage of different kinds of transportation that the Edmonton people used while the table analysis five reasons why the residents drive cars in rural area.
It can be clearly seen that the pie chart has 4 types of features, and car has the highest number of users compares to 3 others. The table shows that the explanation travelling to work is the most popular one.
The pie chart represent car, LRT, bus and taxi. It indicates that using bus and taxi remain unpopular as each of them made up for one tenth of the graph. Car, which has the highest proportion, is at 45%, slightly higher than light rail transit 5%.
The table shows that following by the highest features at more than a half, the people who using car in city for business and taking children to school account for 45% and 40% respectively. And the rest belongs to shopping and leisure activities which are equal to each other.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that advertising aimed at children should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagrams illustrated the process of building an igloo 78
- The diagrams illustrates the process of building an igloo 78
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 763.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62424242424 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42708923757 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642424242424 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3754947204 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.375 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202164257383 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790325871885 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639258768386 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117556274215 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479733085175 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.