The charts below show annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985, 1995 and 2005.
The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on clothes yearly per person in the US over a 20-year period starting from 1985.
Overall, all the categories experienced an increase over the period. In addition, the figures for women’s clothes and men’s clothes were far higher than those for boy’s clothes and girls’ clothes.
Regarding the clothes for boys and men, the annual average spending on boy’s clothes registered under $100 in 1985. After that, this figure increased minimally to nearly $100 ten years later and then remained stable in 2005. Meanwhile, each person in the US paid out roughly $300 in 1985 before surging to over $400 in 1995. Subsequently, this figure witnessed a minimal drop to exactly $400 at the end of the period.
When it comes to the clothes for girls and women, there was a growth in expenditure on girls’clothes from nearly $100 at the beginning of the period to about $120 in 1995 before continuing to grow to over $150 in 1995. Similarly, the figure for women’s clothes surged from approximately $500 to about $650 in 1995.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | zee7 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-23 | kevann | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-23 | kevann | 61 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows the householf recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 73
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting andn reporting the mian features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph below shows the production of paper and packaging wood pulp and sawn wood from 1980 to 2000 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81967213115 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.677383732 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8193451342 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26755818971 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108386680671 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865374286621 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161357697519 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638632226557 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81967213115 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.677383732 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8193451342 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26755818971 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108386680671 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865374286621 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161357697519 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638632226557 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.