The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant
The provided pie charts illustrate the average percentage of each nutritious kinds in four typical meals obtained in the USA. If it is consumed too much, it will be harmful to people’s health.
From a general perspective, dinner requires the largest amounts of two out of three nutrients, namely sodium and saturated fat, nevertheless the most added sugar was eaten in snacks.
On average, it is noticeable that sodium stands at the first rank in the evening meal, at 43%. Besides, the second-largest consumption belongs to the statistic of the rate of saturated fat at dinner. Conversely, added sugar, which accounted for only 23% at dinner, contributes the highest detail to the percentage of it in snacks, at 42%.
Looking at the pie charts in more detail, we can see that standing at less than a fifth, breakfast and dinner obtain the least amount of sodium. Likewise, the proportions of saturated fat and added sugar are eaten at breakfast share an equal figure, at 16%. Also, the rates of the three types of nutrients seemed quite the same at lunch, which formed 29% sodium, 26% saturated fat, and 19% added sugar.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Daniel3003 | view | |
| 2022-12-27 | samuel961 | view |
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers should be paid more while many people think that other people like film actors or singers should be paid huge sums of money due to the importance of the work that they do and their rol 78
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, first, if, likewise, look, nevertheless, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89528795812 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68256024948 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638743455497 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5140572201 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.23603664747 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116716438057 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574215798056 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469364877513 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085331409624 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638566057081 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.