The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The three pie charts given compare the proportion of consuming three kinds of nutrients in typical meals in America.
In general, it is transparent that American people consume most sodium and saturated fat in dinner, while added sugar is eaten the most in snacks. In addition, the amount of each kind of nutrients is relatively similar in breakfast.
Concerning the breakfast, the American consume the same amount of nutrients, 14% of sodium and 16% of both saturated fat and sugar. When eating lunch, American people tend to consume much more sodium and saturated fat, with the percentage of 29% and 26% respectively, whereas the amount of added sugar just accounts for nearly a fifth.
Noticeably, the USA citizens eat a great amount of sodium and saturated fat in their dinner, with the figure of 43% and 37%, which are almost threefold higher than that of breakfast. Not following the same trend, those two kinds of nutrients are consumed less in snacks. There are just 14% of sodium and 21% of saturated fat consumed when people eat snacks. In contrast, American people eat snacks containing added sugar the most, with the amount of 42%, which is higher than every other meals’.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 11 view
2024-03-28 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-04 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-12-06 Tosyne 67 view
2023-12-03 lethianhthu 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urated fat and sugar. When eating lunch, American people tend to consume much mor...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in general, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51865043228 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1663208837 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.222222222 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103761754992 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532777971276 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660003656817 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921718157415 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809968372615 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.