The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day.
The given pictures demonstrate how a university campus has been transformed from the year 2010 till the present day.
In general, the university campus has undergone remarkable developments since 2010. It is also noted that more new student accommodation has been built and buildings such as university offices and teaching block have been replaced by new constructions.
Looking at the maps, it is obvious that the university offices have been converted into science building, while Arts building has been erected in the place of Arts and Science Teaching block previously. In 2010, the lake located in the centre of the campus was surrounded by lawn and seating area. Nonetheless, at present, the lake has remained unchanged whereas the seating area has been removed.
In addition, the campus has been changed considerably, mostly regarding the student accommodation. In 2010, the university campus consisted of 2 buildings of student accommodation. However, the one that near the lake has been torn down to make way for student facilities such as shops offices. In fact, there are 2 additional student accommodation buildings. In which, one block is located in the proximity of the old one, and the other one has been constructed to replace the shops. The restaurant which used to be situated near the shops also has been knocked down.
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day 67
- The graph gives information about the age of the population of Iceland between 1990 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different are of the UK between 2001 and 2011 78
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 78
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, nonetheless, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in fact, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92192791215 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6371565817 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9166666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294640417949 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114538977803 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811194751496 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208507664234 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635836327403 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, nonetheless, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition, in fact, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1127.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1935483871 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92192791215 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6371565817 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9166666667 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294640417949 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114538977803 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0811194751496 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208507664234 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635836327403 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.