The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,

and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the amount of sodium, added sugar and saturated fat people consumed in the USA. They also describe each category separately in 3 typical meals. Overall, sodium and fat were consumed mostly is the evening meal. However, the largest percentage of sugar were eaten in the free-time snacks.

In dinner, the US citizens had their meal consisted of large amount of sodium and saturated fat. It can be seen that 43% of sodium people ate in a day were in the supper. Moreover, 37% of daily eaten fat were consumed in the dinner as well. Similarly, in lunch, US populations ate the foods which were cooked with mostly sodium and saturated fat. 29% of sodium and 26% of fat were marked as the highest nutrients each person received in their lunch meal.

In the other way, sugar was most consumed when it came to the in-between-meal food as it was demonstrated in the graph that 42% of sugar were added in this meal. With regard to other meals, the amount of sugar added were relatively in stable rate around 20% each.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 yasamin27 73 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 67 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 56 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 61 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 61 view
Essays by user NeutronnzZ :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, similarly, so, well, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67391304348 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40676818187 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.1856184634 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1818181818 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0669747426962 0.215688989381 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320469173172 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0152190550879 0.0843802449381 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0504078075543 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193318500695 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.