In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to?
Today, in many countries, It is quite common to see people living in such places where the utilization of goods are not permenant. Regarding the trend, there are several causes and results which will be discussed in this essay.
First and foremost, because lots of big companies are continiously working on upgrading their products, people annually encounter with new models developed by them. That is why, it can be observed that an influx of consumers buy a product. What influences this tendency firstly is advertisement that uses its own psycological tricks to make people buy a particular product. Smartphone business can be taken as a good example, because of the reason that a large majority of people are very interested in them. Whenever the new models are distrubuted to shops to sell, users no longer satisfy with previous smartphone that they use and want to purchase new one. What is more, not only advertisement, but also the number of affluent people in a society should be taken into account. That is because, those not having enough financial state are less likely to spend their money on new model of smartphone, since they are very watchful toward controlling their budget.
Turning to the effects, this can be considered as a negative development, since a short usage of products may give rise to material waste, and also the increasing production of such subtances that are not enviromentally friendly at all. As people do not utilize goods in a long-lasting way, some of them are definetely intent on buying new ones due to the reasons noted before. Moreover, there are lots of such costumers which in turn will increase the sales of a particular product, and companies will have to continue to produce it to get more profit. Therefore, a large amount of materials will be used in the factories, and this will lead to the depletion of the natural resources, since there are such parts of the goods that cannot be recycled.
In summary, advertisement has a great role in making people change things frequently throwing away the old one and buying new one. However, not all people do this as those having high income mostly prefer to change their products using for short time. Consequently, all of these will cause the excessive use of materials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | yasir2002011 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | yasir2002011 | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-14 | Toghrul Azizli | 73 | view |
- In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away. What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 73
- Children s education is expensive In some countries the government should pay for some of or all of the costs Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages 78
- In some countries young people are not only richer but also safer and healthier than ever before However they are less happy What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 89
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries; China and India. 73
- The diagram shows how chewing gum is made. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a long-lasting way" with adverb for "long-lasting"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... at all. As people do not utilize goods in a long-lasting way, some of them are definetely intent on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in summary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93489583333 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73530118243 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2462553814 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180934695211 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607529293072 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528515535338 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121432308409 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478298909065 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.