The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019
Sumerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparions where relevant.
The charts illustrate the relationship between the number of electrical appliances owned and the number of hours people do housework in the period of time.
There is an increase tendency can be seen generally in in the percentage of households with electrical appliances. The number of refrigerators and vacuum cleaners increased dramatically to 100 percent in 2000 and stayed unchanged for the next 20 years, while the number of washing machines fluctuated between 40 percent and 75 percent in the period from 1920 to 2019. Only in 1960 did washing machines and vacuum cleaners meet each other in the amount of ownership at 70 percent. In a comparison with the proportion of households owned, a contrast trend was described in the time people doing housework. The amount of time of housework witnessed a significant decline from 50 hours per week to 15 hours per week for the first 60 years, before a stability at 15 hours for the following 20 years. It plunged to 10 hours per week in 2019.
In conclusion, the more the modern households apply, the more time people are free of housework.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ber of hours people do housework in the period of time. There is an increase tendency can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...increase tendency can be seen generally in in the percentage of households with elect...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 913.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90860215054 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83325171783 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0217408528 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.125 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184693804923 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847628279977 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517304505936 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141344089239 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453903279082 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.