The line charts provide information about the alternating in ownership of households electrical devices and the duration of housework done per week, per household in one nation from 1920 to 2019.
In general, while the proportions of the refrigerator and vacuum cleaner increased during the years, vacuum cleaner had erratic values from 1960 to 2000. The aggregate of hours spent on housework fell dramatically in the first 40 years, and then unchanged from 1980 to 2000 then had a little decline in 2019.
According to the first chart, the refrigerator rocketed and vacuum cleaner went up gradually by 20% every 20 years. Reached a peak at 100%, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner stabilized from 1980 and 2000 respectively. The washing machine had the highest value at around 75% in 2010 and had erratic values from 1960 to 2000, fluctuated 5% each 20 years.
It can easily be seen in the second chart is the figure of hours doing housework were highest in 1920, at 50 hours per week, then declined to 20 hours in 1960. From 1980 to 2000, it remained steady at about 15 hours and then decreased a little in 2019, with a little more than 10 hours a week. It can also be noticed that, when the number of devices rose, the figure of hours doing housework went down.
- The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film release Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- The graph and chart below give information about 3D cinema screens and film release Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 85
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vacuum cleaner stabilized from 1980 and 2000 respectively. The washing machine h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74208144796 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54790108171 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0396544598 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.444444444 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11664948716 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547183659012 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725810146799 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930870251182 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089379436578 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.