The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
The charts Illustrate the shifts of the percentages of electrical amenities in households and the number of hours spent on doing chores from 1920 to 2019.
As can be seen from the charts, all three-surveyed sectors of electric appliances including washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner went through an upward trend with the first two categories having highest figures. Meanwhile, there was a downward trend in the amount of time people spent on doing housework between 1920 Karend 2019
In particular, there were only a few households owning the refrigerator in 1920, at about 1%, compared to 30% of vacuum cleaners and 40% of washing machines. The figure for refrigerator ownership week experienced two-stage rise in the following years, first exponentially by 90 times then rose steadily to 100% in 1980 before levelling off in the next 39 years. Similar patterns happened with other two sectors. While by 2000, the percentage of vacuum cleaners had reached its peak at 100% and stabilized since, that of washing machines went through a period of volatility and ended up at 70% in 2019.
Meanwhile, it was recorded that people spent 50 hours per week doing household chores in 1920. Then the number fell drastically to under a half before gradually decreased to 10 hours every week in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-25 | Mohsensnake | 78 | view |
- the diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal What are the problems of focusing mainly on economic development Suggest possible solutions 67
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
...ard trend with the first two categories having highest figures. Meanwhile, there was a downwar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen rose steadily to 100% in 1980 before levelling off in the next 39 years. Simi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11627906977 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78904602287 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623255813953 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6407062182 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.5 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254557704526 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105072050682 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103412135416 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170542913547 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812378539488 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.