The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari

The chart shows the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
From the first chart, we can see that the percentage of washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner are growing between 1920 and 2019. Remarkablely, refrigerator has a repidly growth from 0% to 100% in 1920 to 1980 and stead in 100% till 2019. Vacuum cleaner experienced the similar growing path as refrigerator, from 30% in 1920 to 100% in 2000, raising 20% every 20 years. While as for the washing machine, starting at 40% of households in 1920, it experienced a slow growth to 70% in 1960 and dropped to 60% in 1980, after then it start to grow again and hit the highest point at about 75% in 2019.
The second chart indicated the drop trend on number of hours of housework per week. In 1920, it took people 50 hours of housework per week, and this number decreasing repidly to 15 hours in 2000 and then reach the lowest point at 10 hours housework per week.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, then, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59239130435 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5399862223 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554347826087 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1669752832 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258771032382 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151805170474 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.224743066354 0.0843802449381 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286767280026 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.291872644253 0.0819641961636 356% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.