The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given line graphs represent information about the proportion of households using basic electrical devices including washing machines, refrigerators, vacuum cleaners and how long people do household work on a weekly basis between 1920 and 2019.
Overall, the number of houses had appliance increase throughout the mentioned period. However, there was a decline in the amount of time people spend on doing housework.
In 1920, most of the family did not have refrigerator but this percentage increased to 90% in 1960 and was the highest proportion among the three devices. There was the same in the percentage of households using washing machines and vacuum cleaners in 1960. The number of families used washing machine went down in 1980 at around 65% and then increased to 75% in 2019. In addition, in 1980, every household had their own refrigerators and in 2000, 100% of families used vacuum cleaners and they remained till 2019.
Between 1920 and 1960, the number of hours that people spent on household works decreased remarkably, from 50 hours to just only 20 hours per week. The number continued reducing and stood at around 10 hours per week in 2019.
- Some people prefer to buy local products while others prefer international products To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07291666667 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64950123058 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598958333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6227880175 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161819219333 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672353728742 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532667445563 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107351657318 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448767252904 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.