The charts below show the comparison of time spent, in minutes per day, by UK’s males and females on household and leisure activities in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides information about how many minutes men and women spent on entertainment, while the bar chart compares the average daily time, in minutes, spent by males and females and household chores in 2008.
Overall, men spent their time watching TV, video listening radio, and engaging in sports more than women, whereas the time spent on reading among females was higher than their partner. In addition, females tend to dedicate more minutes to doing housework, while males showed a higher average minutes on repairing
Looking at the table in more detail, both genders preferred watching TV, videos, and listening to the radio, with men dedicating around 137 minutes daily, about 20 minutes more than women. Additionally, males also participate more in sports, with 15 minutes, compared to females, only 11 minutes. In terms of reading, women showed a higher time spent, in minutes per day, than men, with 19 minutes of the former and 18 minutes of the latter.
Regarding household activities, there was a significant difference between the time spent in minutes each day on cooking and washing by males and females, with the former standing first with nearly 80%, twofold to that of the latter. The disparity between the two figures was almost the same in clothes washing and ironing. Women spent the majority of their time cooking and washing dishes, averaging 30 minutes daily, more than twice the time men spent. Additionally, females spent around 35 minutes per day shopping, in comparison with only 25 minutes spent by males. Lastly, men spent just under 20 minutes on repairs, double the time women allocated to this task.
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists and not local people Why is this the case What can be done to attract local people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... higher time spent, in minutes per day, than men, with 19 minutes of the former and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, lastly, look, regarding, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08518518519 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45245880369 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.552570046 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.3 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253830491671 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120383261396 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772628385179 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179060795691 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454958087571 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.