Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary. To what extent do you agree/disagree
The virtual classroom is beginning to rival physical classroom as the best place to study. I believe that this trend will continue, and the the traditional classroom model will soon be just replaced by e-learning.
On the one hand, learning on the Internet is superior to learning in a classroom in many ways. Online classes will help learners overcome time constrants and geographical boundaries, which is particular helpful for people in rural and remotes areas. Furthermore, everyday millions of students are taken to school by motorbikes or cars, which emit a large amount of gas emision in the environment. However, the advent of online courses can solve this problem and protect the environment.
On the other hand, it will have many difficulties if traditional classroom is replaced by virtual classroom. To begin with, some disciplines have to be taught face to face because of its complication. For example, chemistry and physics involving elaborate lab set-up and equipment are impossible to learn in the comfort of student’s own home. Therefore, physical interaction will help students acknowledge about these subjects. In addition, student can not have live discussion when they learn online, although nowadays people can use many web-based class such as Zoom or Google Meet and teachers can divide room for student to discuss together online. However, it will not be as effective as a physical classroom. Many students can take advantage of virtual learning to do do personal work such as playing games or sleeping. Moreover, they can easily distract by many external influencing elements like the noise from vehicle or their family. As a result, pupils can easily get bad marks during e-learning.
In conclusion, I disagree with the view that online classes are superior to conventional learning in severals aspects, and I believe that the latter is by no means expendable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | dorae | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | quan12341234 | 81 | view |
| 2023-07-08 | autumnisthebest | 90 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of international applicants from four countries that a European university had from 2004 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 100
- The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ieve that this trend will continue, and the the traditional classroom model will soon b...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ieve that this trend will continue, and the the traditional classroom model will soon b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: do
...n take advantage of virtual learning to do do personal work such as playing games or ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24752475248 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8880584504 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577557755776 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6180080464 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132196372611 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045348839801 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471006434767 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100131638299 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418520248832 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.