The charts below show the comparison of time spent, in minutes per day, by UK’s Males and Females on household and leisure activities in 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts provide a comparison of the average daily time, in minutes, spent by men and women in the UK on various household and leisure activities in 2008.
Overall, the data reveals that men in the UK spent more time on leisure activities, particularly watching TV and engaging in sports, whereas women dedicated more time to household chores such as cooking, washing, and ironing.
According to the table, men dedicated significantly more time to leisure activities such as watching TV, video, and listening to the radio, averaging 137 minutes per day compared to 118 minutes for women. Men spent 18 minutes reading, slightly less than the 19 minutes spent by women. Additionally, men allocated 15 minutes to sports activities, while women spent only 11 minutes on the same.
The bar chart highlights the gender disparities in household tasks. Men spent approximately 30 minutes on cooking and washing, whereas women spent around 75 minutes daily on these activities. In terms of shopping, men spent about 25 minutes, while women spent around 35 minutes. When it came to repair work, men invested nearly 20 minutes, significantly more than the 10 minutes spent by women. Lastly, men spent about 10 minutes on clothes washing and ironing, in contrast to the 30 minutes spent by women.
- All university students should do some voluntary work to help the local community To what do you agree or disagree 78
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pie charts show the size of classes in primary schools in four states in Australia in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, lastly, so, whereas, while, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1078.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08490566038 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72767157833 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504716981132 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7417329815 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223698246563 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11562613569 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730533915452 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180815718097 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808112855508 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.