The charts below show how selected age groups purchased concert, cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the internet was accessed.
The left bar chart depicts the proportion of people in two age groups 25-44 and 65+ who bought concert, cinema, and theater tickets online while the right one shows the usage of the desktop computer, laptop, and mobile phone as access mediums to purchased tickets. The data were collected in three countries, Australia, the UK, and Malaysia, over the first three months of 2006; and the unit was used in both two charts is the percentage (%).
It can be seen from the first chart that, in both Australia and the UK, there were more young people than old people who bought the tickets on the Internet. To be more precise, the percentage of people aged between 25 and 44 in these two countries who bought the tickets online was significantly high with more than 50%, while that of age 65 and over was approximately 45%. On the other side, in an Asia country, Malaysia, a different picture of the same thing can be seen with the higher proportion for the age of 65 and over, although there was a tiny difference of only 2%.
In the way of purchase of the tickets, desktop computer mainly was accessed by people in all three countries with around 60%, followed by the laptop with 30% of England, and 40% of people in both Australia and Malaysia used it to book the tickets. Finally, with no more than 30% of users, the mobile phone was a less common tool that people used to buy the cards on the Internet.
In conclusion, the most significant amount of people who bought online tickets relates to the continent. Interestingly, the highest usage of tools which was used to purchase the cards was in Malaysia. Interestingly, the highest usage of devices to buy the tickets was in Malaysia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | lili__nhnh | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | mary.ssherr | 87 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | VuXuan | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | VuXuan | 67 | view |
| 2018-02-05 | monashaik | 81 | view |
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss bot view and give your 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects sustainable forestry The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first years as the projects are set u 69
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69963369963 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45338283292 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7972520231 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.555555556 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3333333333 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30122080685 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120813653742 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704302274176 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180717844518 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109778199196 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.