The charts below show how selected age groups purchased concert, cinema, and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the Internet was accessed.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar charts illustrate how concert, cinema, and theatre tickets were bought by age groups in Australia, the UK and Malaysia, and the most prevalent means of access in the first three months of 2006.
Overall, 25-44 age group was the most likely to buy tickets online. It is also clear that desktop computer dominated means of access to make purchases.
Nearly 60% of 25-44-year-old Australian obtained tickets online, the same pattern can be seen for the UK. Meanwhile, about 35% Malaysian young and middle-aged people used Internet to order tickets. For 65+ age group, Australian were the most likely to purchase tickets online (approximately 45%), followed by the UK people and Malaysian, with over 40% and about 40% respectively.
Over the first three months of 2006, desktop computer was the most common means of access to buy tickets with over 60% of using in both three nations. 45% of people in Australia and Malaysia used laptop while this percentage in the UK was 30%. Only 30% or lower of individuals in these states chose mobile phone to order tickets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-01 | lili__nhnh | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-27 | xenocide | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-24 | mary.ssherr | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-21 | mary.ssherr | 87 | view |
| 2018-07-20 | VuXuan | 67 | view |
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 73
- People who cause their own illnesses through unhealthy lifestyles and poor diets should have to pay more for health care To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 66
- The bar chart below shows the employment of all males and females workers by occupation in the UK in the year 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before What do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people in Great Britain living alone by age and sex in 2004 05 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57358375293 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8627536679 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280065991943 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108287138022 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116646098227 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185568445471 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105953104277 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.