The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
The three bar charts compare the differences between developing countries and industrialized countries in terms of average years of schooling, the percentage of scientists and technicians and money spending on research and development.
It is obvious that industrialised countries far more surpassed developing countries in the aspects of average schooling years, the proportion of scientists and technicians in population and the investment in research and development between 1980 and 1990. And the gap between developing countries and industrialised countries were broadened dramatically.
Overall, the participation of education and science in industrialized countries went up significantly from 1980 to 1990, evidence could be seen no matter in the average years of schooling, the percentage of scientists and technicians or money used for research and development. While in developing countries, research and development investment shrank to a lower number over the ten years, and no huge improvements occurred in the average years of schooling, these two explain why the number of scientists and technicians per 1000 people is much smaller than that in industrialised countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Iruki | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Lê Thị Hà | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Mario Nese | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | r.hojat | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 84
- Long-Term International Migration, UK, 1999-2008 73
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and waterconsumption in two different countries. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.8901734104 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48803580811 2.65546596893 131% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50289017341 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.7167552189 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 203.8 112.824112599 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292295842918 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177104025791 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632023066325 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205202869626 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650409546229 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.6 13.2329268293 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.51 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.4140731707 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.