The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The given bar charts depict three different socio-economic indicators, namely the average years of education, the number of scientists and technicians every 1000 inhabitants and the spending on research and development, in wealthy and poorer countries, during a 10-years period starting since 1980 onwards.
Overall, it can be said that the developed countries performed better in all the categories under examination, in fact all indicators raised roughly around the 30% on average, although the non industrialized countries experienced an increase as well. Speaking about the years of schooling, the richest countries saw a 10% increase, almost the same of the under-development countries; despite the raise of the schooling period, the ratio between the scientific workforce and the population slightly raised from 10 to 20 in the developing countries, while the same category almost doubled from 40 to 70 every thousands residents in the "first world". To sum up, in both wealthy and poorer areas, these two indicators increased even if at a very different rate.
Such a trend is not followed as regard to the expenditures in research and development in the less developed nations, which experienced a decrease around 25% in the decade from 1980 to 1990. On the contrary, the developed nations did not deviate from the tendency described above, seeing the income spent in this crucial category boosting from 150 to slighty less than 350.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Lê Thị Hà | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | Mario Nese | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | antonio | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | antonio | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows some design principles for an energy efficient house and how they work in different climates Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- Some say that because many people are living much longer, the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably. 61
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activity that improve the mind, such as reading and doing word puzzles. Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., while the same category almost doubled from 40 to 70 every thousands residents ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, well, while, in fact, speaking about, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1237.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42543859649 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08256897017 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635964912281 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.3507769674 43.030603864 224% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 206.166666667 112.824112599 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 5.23603664747 251% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988943103034 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477750139124 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305535633006 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636279431747 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236947759054 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.2329268293 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 61.2550243902 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.81 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.06136585366 130% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 11.0658536585 190% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.