The charts below show the main reason for studying among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The first chart illustrates studies taken by various groups for careers and interest. While, second chart depicts the percentage of employers support students have with fees and time off.
Overall, students of age group under 26 dominated all other age groups for career. Despite this, in terms of interest it recorded the least. They got highest support from employers also.
With regards to the first graph, the reasons for studying for career decreases gradually from age group of under 26 to over 49. It is accounted as 80% to below 20% respectively. While, in terms the student studying for interest increased significantly in the same age group. Initiating at 10%, increasing to approximately 40% in 4 age groups before reaching at peak for over 49 recorded as 70%.
On focusing the second chart, the students who got support from employers by age group of under 26 at the highest percentage 65%. While other fluctuated and remains lower. People of 30 to 39 age group got support about two times less from the highest. In age group 40 to 49 and over 49 only one of ten difference had been seen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | kashyap sahil | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | Wisnu Legowo | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world 100
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspaper or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kind of meat in European country from 1979 to 2001 73
- The table shows the sales in a small restaurant in downtown business district
- Some people believe that smartphones are destroying social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'got the highest'.
Suggestion: got the highest
...of interest it recorded the least. They got highest support from employers also. With re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...They got highest support from employers also. With regards to the first graph, th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57182690491 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563157894737 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0400661808 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7692307692 112.824112599 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6153846154 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61538461538 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400653171565 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144568046462 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843972274226 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260566970009 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165028433467 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.