The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers
The bar charts illustrate data on why employees at different ages participate in education and the quantity of their employers’ support for this.
Overall, while the majority of staff under 40 years old studied for their career, most employees aged from 50 felt interested in this activity. Moreover, employers provided the biggest help for the youngest staff, but the least support for workers at their 30s.
To begin with, 80% of students aged younger than 26 (1) took part in study for their jobs as opposed to one tenth of them (1) for enthusiasm. Similarly, about 4 times as the people in the 26-29 age group studied for career as for interest; the figures were precisely 70% and around 15% respectively. Moreover, the number of workers aged over 49 going to school (2) for interest was much greater than that (2) for career; a difference of nearly 50%. In contrast, more employees in the 30-39 age group were motivated by career than by enthusiasm, with the participation rates of almost 60% and well under 30% respectively. The figures for both motivations were similar in the 40-49 age group, at exactly 40%.
Furthermore, employers paved the way for about 60% of students under the age of 26, but for nearly one third of staff at their 30s. A half of workers from 26 to 29 years of age received the help compared to more or less 40% of students aged from 40.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | kaylee207 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | kashyap sahil | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | Wisnu Legowo | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 73
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 89
- Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this been a positive or negative development? 84
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, third, thus, well, while, as for, in contrast, more or less, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6846473029 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66428817901 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564315352697 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0599219426 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.9 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7 5.23603664747 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29262156168 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134538097875 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394266788341 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198054695595 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207158305932 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.