The given charts compare the reason why students of different age groups want to go study and whether they receive from their employer support.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that most of the student aged under 26 tend to study because of their career purposes, whereas people who aged over 49 studies for their interest. Besides, students who are under 26 receive a lot of support from their employer.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can see that there are 80% of students who are under 26 years old study for their career purposes, instead of interest which accounts for 10% of people. In two age groups, 26 to 29 and 30 to 39 see a slight decrease in studying for their career, while for interest purposes go up. At the 40-49 age group, the figure for both career and interest are the same, with 40% of people. When they turn to their 50, base on the given data, most of them study for their interest (70%) compared to 18% of people who choose their career.
Over 60% of students who aged under 26, received the support from their employer. By contrast, there are only 30% of people from the 30-39 age group are supported by their employer. The figures rise slightly for student in their forties and for those aged 50 or more.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received fromemployers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 73
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52422907489 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15537835293 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528634361233 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.768832017 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198133249754 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109883068313 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564284982947 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167559348627 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602613655738 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.