A glace at the given pie charts compare the amount of electricity which was produced by fuel source in Autralia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen clearly from the provided data that the total production in Australia and France rocketes sharply. In 2000, coal was the most popular used in Australia, whereas nucleas was utilised the most in France.
The total production in Australia saw a significant change in the year 1980 and 2000. The units of oil and natural gas which were 10 units and 20 units respectively in 1980, declined considerably only 2 units both of them in the year 2000. Hydro power and coal, however, increased remarkably 16 units went up by hydro power and doubled by coal (130 units).
The toal production increased double in France from 90 units (1980) to 180 units (2000). The amount of eclectricity produced by natural gas and hydropower went down from 25 units and 5 units in 1980 to 2 units for both of them in 2000. On the contrary, oil and nuclear both rose up 25 units for oil and especially over 100 units for nuclear power in 2000, while coal still remained unchanged (25 units).
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received fromemployers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 930.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60396039604 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46168561937 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8252926953 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257144683936 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124888269917 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729436808165 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169826312487 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557118788077 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.