The two charts give information about what students of different ages study for and how much the companies support them.
Overall, individuals from under 26 to 39 years old study for their employment and the quality of their job while the over 40-year-old's aim is different. The amount of break duration and money donated to help those students gradually go down and up.
Regarding the first chart, the youngsters ( under 26-29 ) take prior to their work status: 80% to 10%, 70% to between 20% and 10%, and almost 60% to slightly over 30%. Meanwhile, the older balance between their career and interest ( a bit over 40% to the same amount) or even rate their enjoyment higher than business (under 20% to 70%).
The employers significantly support the freshmen up to about 70% of the second chart, followed by the students of 20-29 age group: 60%. However, they cut down to the 30-49 around 20% - 30% and the rest is 10% reduction.
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received fromemployers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write 95
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 78
- Every year several languages die out every year. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier when there are fewer languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 61
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion? To what extent do you support this development? 89
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...egarding the first chart, the youngsters under 26-29 take prior to their work st...
^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...first chart, the youngsters under 26-29 take prior to their work status: 80% to ...
^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alance between their career and interest a bit over 40% to the same amount or eve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78881987578 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44654012922 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4476801167 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141544709037 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737073702182 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073002471861 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105723723909 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769932575041 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.