The three given pie charts illustrate the percentage of different purposes on the utility of resources and their distribution and residents' around the world.
Overall, the expenditures of sources are divided into 5 items which are food, outfits, domestic use, transportation and a sum of other usages in the first pie chart. Next, the second chart provides the proportions of people who live in continents of the world and the remaining chart is about the disposal of resources users.
Firstly, it is clear that the necessity of clothes is the lowest which accounts for only 6% shown in the first chart. On the contrary, the highest proportion belongs to other usage. Coincidently, the utilization of household is twice as much as clothing (12% to 6%), transport is three times (18% to 6%) and the food is four times (24% to 6%)
In the second chart, the population is mostly distributed in Asia which is more than half of civilians in the world (57%). After that, Europian and American have the same percentage of the chart (14%) which is far less than Asian despite the second position in the chart. Plus, the rests of the chart are Africa(10%) and Other sites (5%). Although the proportion in the US and Europe is lower than in Asia, the utility of resources in the US and Europe is the highest (60%) compared to the rest of the world
- Many people believe that they should spend their money to enjoy life at present. Others, however, think that they should save it for the future. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed. 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces and their distribution and residents around the world. Overall, the expend...
^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more than half of civilians in the world 57%. After that, Europian and American h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68803418803 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61824950626 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525641025641 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0545192511 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.888888889 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19124666848 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794559454775 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494254057931 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12276169862 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580104519272 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.