The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the amount of a kind of toxic gas: Carbon Dioxide (CO2) which every person in five European sections (the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal) absorbs for the period of 40 years from 1964. In addition, the graph is measured in metric tonnes.

The contamination in the atmosphere in the United Kingdom is the most severe at the beginning of the graph, and the purest area is Portugal. On the contrary, the trends of the two lower air pollution countries (Italy and Portugal) go upwards while the two leading countries (the United Kingdom and Sweden) had decreased throughout the years.

A citizen in the UK had to suffer less and less amount of carbon dioxide emissions from 1967 to 2007. It is slightly different in Sweden, from 1967 to about a decade later, the line goes up, but it had reduced dramatically in the remain years of the graph (more than 10 metric tonnes to nearly 5 metric tonnes)

Regarding Italy and Portugal, the air pollution in these two sections had risen almost the same due to the superior platform of Italy which makes the difference ( about more than 2 metric tonnes)

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS General Training
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... up, but it had reduced dramatically in the remain years of the graph more than 10 metric ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...form of Italy which makes the difference about more than 2 metric tonnes
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, while, in addition, kind of, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 937.175257732 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 206.0 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74358974359 4.54256449028 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44769612188 2.54303337028 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 7.0 0.824742268041 849% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.463917525773 647% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 16.3608247423 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.992063211 44.8134815571 250% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 154.166666667 76.5299724578 201% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 32.5 16.8248392259 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 4.34317383033 261% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196266983181 0.216113520407 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951708684175 0.0766984524023 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457793057159 0.0603063233224 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113322923441 0.12726935374 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412346146567 0.0580467560999 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 8.37731958763 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 70.7449484536 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 7.45979381443 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 8.71597938144 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 8.54432989691 173% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.