The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
The bar charts present the percentages in the essential cause for education such as for carrier and interests between the different ages students and the quantity of help to them from employers.
Overall, t can be seen that studying for a carrier is the highest level among the people who are under 26 while studying for interests are more popular over 49-year-olds. In another chart shows information about how employers give more support to roughly one-quarter ages.
Now turning to the details of reasons in studying for the job we can find that there is a decrease by years, so numbers under twenty-six ages are four-fifth and 49+-year-olds are 4 times less. Despite these students who want to study for interests are increasing when they are getting older. According to the data under 26 ages study for benefits are one in ten and are reaching in its the highest level about seven in ten in around half year olds. It is also noticed that in the age of 40-49 are the same reasons for studying. Looking at the glance of help with fees and time off it is observed that the figures are dropping till 30-39 ages (from just over three fifths to around 35%) and then again are jumping slightly about 10% till over forty-nine years old.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 369, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...fits are one in ten and are reaching in its the highest level about seven in ten in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57489878543 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41729902784 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502024291498 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.0078119452 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.875 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235167077145 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119373074498 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039894839993 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135667004129 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546670244561 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.82 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.