The charts below show the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007.
The bar charts compare the quantities of Europeans who had to suffer from
different kinds of noise in the daytime and nighttime between cities and rural
areas in 2007.
Overall, traffic was the main reason for noise in both periods and the number of
noise sufferers in urban areas was higher than in rural ones.
68 million city dwellers became victims of traffic noise in daytime, which nearly
doubled the figure recorded in the countryside. In comparison, traffic noise was a
less severe problem with them in nighttime, but the quantity of victims in cities
was still twofold higher than in rural areas, at 48 and 24 million respectively.
A smaller number of people both in urban and rural areas had troubles with noise
from trains by day, recording 10 and 8 million respectively, which was 2 million
higher than the figures at night. Noises from aircraft and industry did not affect
people in both areas much, with its figure under 4 million. Strikingly, nobody living
in the countryside were affected by industrial noise.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 73
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think parents should read or tell stories to children Others think parents needn t do that as children can read books or watch TV movies by themselves Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03448275862 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52311287102 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574712643678 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2750851369 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.142857143 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280199007378 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134099143893 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057719441299 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940936162281 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517752633078 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.