The charts below show the number of working hours per week, in industrial sector, in four European countries in 2002. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant.
The provided graphics demonstrate the amount of time spent on working weekly in industrial factories, in various European nations, namely France, Denmark, Sweden, and the UK in the year 2002.
A first glance at the graphs reveals that Swedish laborers obtained the largest entire working hours among others. Moreover, the 36-49 group gained more popularity than other counterparts.
As is shown in the bar charts, the sum of the proportion of workers attending to work between 1 to 30 hours in Sweden was 50%, exhibiting a remarkably higher figure than the other three areas (35%, 30%, and 24% in France, Denmark, and the UK respectively.) The ratio of laborers who participate in the 41-45 and 46-50 hours ranged from roughly 30% to 40%. Meanwhile, regarding the above 50 hours category, Britain witnessed a noticeable figure with exactly 20% which doubled that of France, Denmark, and Sweden.
In terms of the two remained groups, three out of four surveyed countries were reported that the multitudes worked for 36-40 hours per week, regardless of French workers whereby less than a half opting for 7-8 hours working daily. By contrast, it was up to 50% of laborers in France working between 31to 35 hours, which was approximately two-fold in the percentage of attendants in the industrial parks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-29 | dich duong thien ti | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | Efuli | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | rakholiyadivyesh50@gmail.com | 11 | view |
| 2021-05-16 | sp | 67 | view |
| 2021-03-30 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education center in the year 2009 89
- Some argue younger are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Children engaged in paid work 73
- The diagrams below give information about changes in a student accommodation 84
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...titudes worked for 36-40 hours per week, regardless of French workers whereby les...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, moreover, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11682242991 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68992111499 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644859813084 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7159945073 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.875 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168536534418 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066840226714 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555975163173 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100024712168 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504629148087 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.