When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion that money is a quintessential factor for job-seekers when applying for a position due to its vital role in people’s lives. From my perspective, albeit irrefutable values of a handsome wage, I strongly believe that this element is, by and large, far from being the best.
On the one hand, a regular income has been employees’ livelihood since it could help them meet their basic needs. For example, labors all need money to pay for food, clothes, accommodation, education, and health insurance in order to achieve a high quality of life. Most of the employees, especially freshman, agree that if they choose their occupation based on enjoyment as a prerequisite, not only could they being difficult to cover all essential expenses but also could not liberate themselves from financial dependence on their parents. Thus, these individuals might set the salary rate as an integral part of a professional. Besides, accumulating more wealth could partially lead to happiness because, along with money, they obtain power which determines whether they are important or another expendable. Those factors are the key to why people would be willing to wholeheartedly exert their effort regardless of the amount of workload or their respective job preferences.
On the other hand, other counterpart aspects are as important as the size of the salary offered. Foremost, a healthy workplace in competitors, relationships is also a fundamental element. Having nice employers or friendly colleagues could make other labors feel positive, comfortable, and no longer being under pressure. Accordingly, they might be likely to develop themselves permanently in that job area with the desire to contribute to society. Moreover, almost every senior worker thinks that job satisfaction entailed with experience, achievements, and skills they have garnered rather than the money they earn.
In conclusion, I do not believe that a generous income could completely outweigh all other aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries 89
- Some argue younger are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The following graphs depict the reliability of print and non print academic materials as voiced by undergraduates and postgraduates at 3 different British universities Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The graph below shows the spending on research into renewable sources of energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the cinema attendance of people on different days of the week in 2003 2005 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 59
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40064102564 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04959653673 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663461538462 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1520012777 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.357142857 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106282203718 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324340155386 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296228326292 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574720059324 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.012579047157 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.