The given bar graphs illustrate how many hour of work had been done in a week by people in four different nations in Europe in a year 2002.
Overall, it can be seen from the data that majority of people working upto 36 to 40 hours per week in all the represented locations; except Franch, where 31 to 35 hours range had most prefered by the public. Moreover, In the UK comparatively major individuals work for longer hours than 40.
Looking at the Denmark and UK, little similar trend was observed. However, more or less 10% of the amount was noticed in first three work range for both the nations, in 31 to 35 hours group UK was 10% less than Denmark which was above 20%. 36 hours stage was exact at 50% in the UK, while 20% more people was more in Denmark. In remaining all areas UK and Denmark witnessed above and below 10% figures respectively.
Analysing the Sweden's information, people increased from approx 5% to 80% sharply with working hours till 40. In the 41 to 45 hours about 30% value were there and remained both fields accounted near 8% amount. In the case of France the data was fluctuated around 10% except 31, 36 and 46 hours where the worker were at 50%, around 35% and 20% respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hour seems to be countable; consider using: 'many hours'.
Suggestion: many hours
The given bar graphs illustrate how many hour of work had been done in a week by peop...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45045045045 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39387186675 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585585585586 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1606302086 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0649978195761 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303466309895 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331448130604 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528571955116 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033828375188 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.