The charts below show the percentage of the energy generate from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003. To summarize information by selecting key characteristics and compiling a report and, if necessary, make a comparison.
The pie graphs manifest the proportion of resources generating energy of a particular nation in 1985 and 2003. From an overall perspective, renewable, natural gas and coal experienced an upward trend. In contrast, oil and nuclear power witnessed a considerable decline. Throughout the period, oil was the pivotal energy resource, meanwhile the least utilized counterpart was renewable.
Concerning the former group, in 1985, there was only 1% of power originating from green sources like sun, water or the like. However, in 2003, that figure had increased to 4%. Likewise, the percentage of natural gas 13% and 23%, nearly a quarter, in each year. Coal, notwithstanding possessed a lower fraction, had the same pattern with 8% and 13%.
Oil used to make up more than half the energy generated in the middle of 1980s, nonetheless, after a few decades it plummeted to precisely 39%. Regarding the second largest sources, the proportion of the nuclear power in 1985 and 2003 was 22% and 17% relatively.
Interestingly, hydrogen leveled off at 4% for the whole course.
- Shopping habits depend more on your age group than anything else To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people prefer to relax by doing physical activities while others choose mental activities Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 84
- People nowadays tend to have children at older ages Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20809248555 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96479392321 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687861271676 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.460264305 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9090909091 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7272727273 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146552697483 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049336987451 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532503412477 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729955578537 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045881867228 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.