The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the data of two different groups in one European country with respect to their monthly household income and expenditure on multiple items.
Overall it can be seen that the expenditure of people is divided into two groups known as Low-income group and High-income group, covering expenses like food, fuel, clothing recreational activities and so on.
Firstly, Food and Drink with 29% are a major part of the budget for the low-income public, followed by Fuel which is unexpectedly at second place with 24%. Secondly, Miscellaneous covers almost 18% of the overall bill, further Recreational and Cultural activities stands out at 11%. Lastly, Clothing, Transportation, and restaurants are below 10%.
The high-income group spends most of its budget on miscellaneous and Recreational activities with more than 25%. On the other hand, restaurants, hotels, and eating items are below 15%, whereas Transportation is just ahead of the latter with 16%. For clothing and fuel the budget really low and impressive with less than 10%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-22 | Delime | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | Awadhesh Mourya | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | sonicmaster | 78 | view |
| 2014-06-25 | thanhdoan6992 | 67 | view |
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- he diagram below shows the structure of solar panels and its use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking 73
- Some people believe that giving longer prison sentences is the best way to reduce crime Others believe that there are better ways to reduce crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, whereas, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9969436528 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3155211789 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.625 5.23603664747 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167431755848 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074375407932 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939681870082 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127685502631 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107002444056 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.