The charts below show the percentage of people using public
transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian
cities between 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
features, and make comparison where relevant.
The given line charts illustrate the proportion of public transport and private cars used in five cities in Australia over a period of 10 years.
Overall, it is evident that the preference for private car usage outweighed the inclination towards public transportation across these regions in Australia.
Regarding the first line graph, the percentage of people using public transport in Sydney dominated the chart, with 20% in 2000. This figure witnessed a slight increase to nearly 25% after remaining unchanged in the first three years. Claiming the second position at 18%, the proportion of residents using public transport in Melbourne remained stable over the period while that of Brisbane grew rapidly, which exceeded the figure for Melbourne in 2003 and that for Sydney in 2005 to reach a peak of approximately 30% . In contrast, the number of people using mass transport in Perth and Adelaide accounted for a small proportion, around 10% and 5% respectively.
Turning to another line graph, the figure for Adelaide rose from 70% to 90% over the period, making it the city where private cars were the most popular. A similar fashion was seen in Perth and Brisbane, with 50% and 40% at the beginning, the proportion of people using private cars in these countries experienced a growth of 10% each. However, the figure for Melbourne followed a downward trend, from 30% to 20% while that for Sydney jumped remarkably, overtaking Melbourne in the year between 2002 and 2003 to reach 40% before finishing at 30%.
- the charts below show the Australian dollars in Australia s trade in 3 nations from 2004 to 2009 73
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- the plans below show how a city center before and how it looks now 78
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The given pie charts illustrate data about the percentages of expenditure of individuals on six different categories 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 518, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...005 to reach a peak of approximately 30% . In contrast, the number of people using...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 250.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69857316121 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.0777173779 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247992677835 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117567868585 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854922704437 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165499586878 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555903129688 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.