The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The essay delves into the proposition that using mobile phones ought to be banned like smoking since using mobile phones regularly seems to be as antisocial as smoking, and smoking is forbidden in some public areas. In this essay, I will shed light on some reasons why I totally disagree with this statement.

On the one hand, it can be argued that prohibiting mobile phones is a more defensible stance. First of all, when people restrict their use of mobile phones, they can foster their social relationships with each other. Thus, these relationships can help them have an edge of climbing career ladders and improve their social skills. Secondly, they can decrease the rate of having eye diseases due to the fact that blue light from electronics is linked to eye strain or night blindness.

On the other hand, it is justifiable to opine that forbidding mobile phones is unnecessary. The key rationale is that some people use telephones as a way to keep contact with friends or relatives living far from them. This way of communicating can also help people about social relationships. Moreover, with the rapid development of technology, a huge number of people use phones to work through the Internet. As a result, if people get restricted access to mobile phones, they can face a lack of money.

In conclusion, while banning telephones is considered advantageous across numerous dimensions, I side with people who believe that it is not necessary.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-21 tsln7607 67 view
2023-11-21 tsln7607 61 view
2023-11-21 tsln7607 61 view
2023-08-26 Phạm Phương Uyên 78 view
2023-08-25 songuyen14 89 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00823045267 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78265385168 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8744114831 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.416666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249797217366 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864667235933 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125421973099 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151180803637 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131713523917 0.056905535591 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.