The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in towns A and B in 1960, 2010.
The pie charts depict the distribution of employment of various industries namely manufacturing, sales and services in town A and town B from 1960 to 2010.
As can be seen, town A witnessed the greatest increase in the percentage of people joining in services, which overtook the remaining sectors to employ the majority of the town's workforce. However, in town B, manufacturing had the highest proportion of workers despite a light fall.
Looking at the positive fluctuations first, both charts witnessed the significant growth of one-fifth in the proportion of services, which was the lowest value at first in the two towns. Especially, town A had a great dominance in the fraction of services, accounting for more than three-fifths. Furthermore, despite a little decline, the figure for sale belonging to town B stayed steady at about 20%.
With regard to negative results, the proportion of workers in manufacturing fell considerably by 20% every town but town A had a sharper drop of half in total. Similarly, half of the employees in town having sales-related jobs went down after a 50 years period.
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in towns A and B in 1960 2010 78
- The table below shows the production of cacao beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 73
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and effects of this issue 84
- the bars below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'towns'' or 'town's'?
Suggestion: towns'; town's
...g sectors to employ the majority of the towns workforce. However, in town B, manufact...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13736263736 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11530709053 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6450457088 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.875 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.23603664747 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214104747792 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883020088907 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719373751012 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137179466073 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683400361107 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.