The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960, 2010.
Given are pie charts depicting the alteration in the percentages of workers in different industries, namely manufacturing, sales and services in two distinct towns over a phase of over 40 years, starting in 1960.
It is conspicuous that while both towns shared the same movement in the extension of employee numbers in services and the shrinking in the number of manufacturing workers, the opposite was true for sales.
Regarding the rates of workers in the sales industry, while there were nearly a half fewer people working in this sector in town A from 30% in the first year to around 16% in 2010, town B experienced a period of moderate growth in that number over the years with negligible 2% higher than 20% recorded in the 1960s. Furthermore, this field accounted for the lowest number of employees in both towns compared to the rest in 2010.
In terms of workers’ percentages working in the services industry, an expansion in work labor was recorded in town A when only 29% of people involving in the first year, this rate reached 64% in 2010 which turned from the least favorable job in 1960 to the most popular one 40 years later. Likewise, the same movement was recorded in town B when only 10% of the whole town’s workers in the first year increased to sharply a quarter within 40 years, becoming the second industry with a large number of workers. By contrast, moving backward in the percentage of people employed in manufacturing, the numbers dropped to only a fifth in town A and roughly 53% in town B in the last year given from 41% and 70% in 1960 respectively. Despite that fall, manufacturing still held its first rank in the rate of people working among other fields in town B in the early 21 century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | letrang25011991 | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-19 | kieutrangkg1 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | view |
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Subjects such as art music and drama should be a part of every child s basic education 88
- u
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change What is your opinion 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[3]
Message: Did you mean 'form'?
Suggestion: form
...people working in this sector in town A from 30% in the first year to around 16% in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
... of workers’ percentages working in the services industry, an expansion in work labor wa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ears, becoming the second industry with a large number of workers. By contrast, moving backward i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 863, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
... other fields in town B in the early 21 century.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, likewise, regarding, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70394736842 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68020050052 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513157894737 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.2975951904 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.1263613715 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.75 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 20.7667163134 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360563130861 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164367401415 0.084324248473 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563158664763 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199071022572 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856887537517 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.1190380762 170% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.