The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010

The chart illustrates the proportion of people working in different fields in town A and town B from 1960 to 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that both towns A and B experienced an upward trend in the services sector, and decreases in the manufacturing field. In addition, the services sector became the main employment in town A, while manufacturing still attracted the majority of working people in town B.
Turning to the chart for the detail, in 1960, manufacturing accounted for 41% of working people in town A, compared to 70% of those in town B. There were about 30% of town A’s labor force working in sales and services fields, which was much higher than those in town B, at 20% and 10% respectively.
By 2010, the services field peaked at 64% of the working population in town A, in comparison with a significant increase in those of town B (25%). In addition, the percentage of people employed in the manufacturing sector in towns A and B experienced a considerable fall at 20% and 53% respectively. Notably, there was a double decline in the sales sector in town A, to 16%, whereas that in town B grew slightly to 22%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...nd B experienced an upward trend in the services sector, and decreases in the manufactur...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...e manufacturing field. In addition, the services sector became the main employment in to...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 931.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60891089109 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89205954824 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485148514851 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.2910592679 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 116.375 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.521528474737 0.215688989381 242% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.266146065441 0.103423049105 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125900913906 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.376473942676 0.15604864568 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111279062361 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.