The charts below show the percentage of their food budget the average family spent on restaurant meals in different years. The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants.
The given layouts reveal the information about the family spend on restaurant in different years in two different ways: fast food and sit down restaurants. The data is calebroted in per centum which is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that only 10% people was spend on restaurant meals during the year 1970. Apart from this, the less then fifth people was spend money on restaurants in 1980. Furthermore, the 35% people was in 1990, and the 50% had been spending money on restaurant during 2000 respectively.
As far as trend was concerned with teh fast food meal qas increased year by year. The fast food and sit down restaurants are increased from the same number of meals it os 20. Addition to this, the fast food meals had been increased at the 89 number of meal, on the other hand the the sit down restaurants meals increased at 45 numbers of meal.
Overall, it is evident that the people spend money year by year was increased but the home cooking had been decreasing year by year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | kaka singh | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | Annie442 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | rahulsd | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Chandrakumar Chanthujan | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is fed back to ealier stages to enable adjustment. 73
- Light corporal punishment is being reintroduced in school of uk. What are the advantages and disadvantages of it? Discuss. 67
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment 81
- One should only use enough money to fulfill their needs and rest should gives to needy. To what extent you agree and disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...he year 1970. Apart from this, the less then fifth people was spend money on restaur...
^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...om this, the less then fifth people was spend money on restaurants in 1980. Furthermo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the 35% people was in 1990, and the 50% had been spending money on restaurant du...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...restaurant during 2000 respectively. As far as trend was concerned with teh fas...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...he 89 number of meal, on the other hand the the sit down restaurants meals increased at...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...he 89 number of meal, on the other hand the the sit down restaurants meals increased at...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...9 number of meal, on the other hand the the sit down restaurants meals increased at 45 ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, then, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67039106145 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57060954972 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525139664804 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0454923546 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294715736044 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14361336683 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130008058837 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171057680421 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135883058388 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.43 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.