The given pie chart compares the proportion of people who participated in some organizations voluntarily namely environment, sport, healthcare, education and others in 2008 and 2014.
Overall, it is obvious that there is an upward trend in the rate of vouluteers who took care about environment, sport and healthcare during the 7-year period, starting in 2008, while the figure for the rest one witnessed an reverse pattern. In 2008, the percentage of participants by environment organizations took the lead, but in the next 6 years, environment made its leading position.
In 2008, while educational and environmental oragnizations attracted the majority of people with 24% and 21% respectively, the opposite was true with 7% who joined in healthcare organizations. Moreover, this number for art and for sport had an equal percent relatively, occupying 18% and 15%. Additionally, there was some humans like the others, made up 15%.
In the 14th year of 21st century, different from 6 years ago, envinronment and sport were two sectors that volunteers participate most, with 29% and 25%. The art was the third organizations that people really into, constituted 12%. There was a unnoticeable changed in the figure for healthcare, made up only 8%. And 9% is the proportion of the people took care about the others.
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 222, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e the figure for the rest one witnessed an reverse pattern. In 2008, the percentag...
^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...really into, constituted 12%. There was a unnoticeable changed in the figure for ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, really, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24644549763 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14486314363 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592417061611 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.444845795 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148892710957 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052431590901 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650605991477 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985312387255 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664785425974 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.