The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
These six pic charts compare the proportion of water consumption by three different sectors namely domestic, agricultural and industrial in six regions in the world.
Firstly in North America, industry consumed around half of the total water used for all purposes. However, agricultural use accounted for just below two-fifths of the water consumption, approximately three times the amount of water used for domestic purpose.
Secondly, in Europe, water usage pattern was similar to that in North America since industry consumes the highest percentage of water consumption, followed by agriculture around 53% and 32%, respectively nevertheless. Domestic uses represented around half the amount used in agriculture.
On the other hand, agriculture in Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia consumed more than four-fifths of the total water used in the 3 areas near 84%,88%, and 81%, respectively. Moreover, the percentage of water used in domestic uses were equal in Central and South East Asia 7%, just 2% lower than in Africa. Lastly, the percentage of water used by industry in South East Asia was 12% approximately double the amount in either Africa or Central Asia.
To sum up, it can be clearly seen that the pattern of water use was different in the 6 areas. However, agriculture consumed the highest proportion in South America, Africa, South East Asia and Central Asia while industry uses the highest percentage in North America and Europe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Fedkin | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- One of the major problems facing the world today is the growing number of refugees. The developed nations in the world should tackle this problem by taking more refugees.To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 73
- Average annual expenditures on cell phones and residential phone services 77
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 73
- Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33766233766 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84928737757 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 283.868780488 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2759528412 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 5.23603664747 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310561964576 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14097443069 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607578016576 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18523384994 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569976571418 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.