The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both actual and target what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve and the number of complaints and passengers

Essay topics:

The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target (what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve), and the number of complaints and passengers.

The first graph illustrates the proportion of punctual services divided into two groups of actual and target from 1999 to 2003. In the same period, the second bar chart shows how many complaints were made per thousand passenger’s trips.

Overall, it can be clearly seen that while the percentage of on time buses decreased throughout the given period, there was no clear pattern for the buses that arrived on schedule. Additionally, the number of complaints experienced an upward trend with minor fluctuations.

In 1999, the company’s goal of on time buses started at 86%, which was 1% higher than the actual figure. In the next year, while the company kept the target, the result they got in real life significantly declined to just about 82% in 2000. In the next two year, although there was a reduction in the target to about 85%, the percentage of actual buses arriving on time dramatically climbed to about 84.5% before falling to 84% in 2002. At the end of the period, while the target slightly decreased, the actual on schedule buses hit the peak of nearly 85%, slightly higher than the target.

At the same time, starting at about 70 complaints in 1999, the number of dissatisfied feedback sharply rose to about 100 in the next year. In the last 3 years, while there was a decrease to about nearly 85 complaints in 2001, this figure considerably went up and hit its peak of 120 complaints in 2003.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-02 hien3112 78 view
2023-09-29 tieuquynh 67 view
2023-09-06 lugar123 view
2023-09-06 lugar123 view
2023-08-26 shubham1102 56 view
Essays by user dqnghuy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tly declined to just about 82% in 2000. In the next two year, although there was a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 245.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62857142857 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5469491393 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.6 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191661335516 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790952831261 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339486252121 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109647785217 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501672902959 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.